X

5 Biggest Oscars Upsets (Nominated But Lost)

How about that Oscars night huh? ICYMI they announced “La La Land” as winner for Best Picture to only then reveal it was a mistake and “Moonlight” actually won.

I’ll bet there are some who can think of cases where they WISHED that happened. You may remember last year I did a list about the Biggest Oscar Snubs, well I’m back with another about the biggest upsets. It’s true it’s an honor just to be nominated, however when you’re beaten by something that was inferior, it can be just crazy. Now there are many classic examples you may notice aren’t on this list like “Forrest Gump” beating “Pulp Fiction” and “Shawshank Redemption” or “Driving Miss Daisy” beating “Do The Right Thing” etc. Well they’re not here because honestly I agree with the Academy’s decision. Or examples like Eddie Redmayne beating Michael Keaton which is not here because I still haven’t seen “The Theory of Everything” so it’s not fair for me to compare. I will keep an open mind and give it a fair chance for when I eventually do see it. With all that out of the way let’s begin.

5.) Sixth Sense losing to American Beauty

Like I said earlier, it honestly was hard to find examples to showcase on this list since most of the classic examples I’m actually on the Academy’s side. I went through the years and found an example I don’t often see, but I personally have strong feelings about. Now just to be clear I do like “American Beauty” but out of all of Sam Mendes films it’s one of my least favorite. Personally I think Sam Mendes has made better films since like “Away We Go,” “Road to Perdition,” and the best James Bond ever “Skyfall.” Still, for a first film it is EXTREMELY impressive. Full of quotable lines and jaw dropping visuals. There has been something of a backlash against in the years since, but I don’t agree with it so that has nothing to do with what I’m talking about here. I may one day re-watch “American Beauty” whereas I have already watched “The Sixth Sense” countless times before.

Now “The Sixth Sense” wasn’t M Night Shyamalan’s first movie, but how many people do you know who have actually seen “Praying With Anger” and “Wide Awake?” Like James Cameron with “The Terminator” even though he had made a debut film before, this was practically a redo of starting his career. Now what’s truly exceptional about “The Sixth Sense” is that yes that twist is amazing and so well-done, but the film itself really stands up on its own. Some films with famous twist endings are silly or uninteresting without that initial surprise so re-watching them doesn’t offer much. However, even if you know the twist to “Sixth Sense” it doesn’t stop the scary parts from being scary nor the emotional parts from affecting you. Hell even the deleted scenes that are often added back for the TV version are incredible. It’s honestly very hard for me NOT to cry during the car scene with Cole and his mom towards the end. I know watching Kevin Spacey not give a f@%$ or Annette Bening be the most uptight woman in the world is fun, but there just isn’t much else there. Unless you somehow find Wes Bentley’s musings on a plastic bag blowing in the wind insightful. In which case I… don’t know what to say to you.

4.) Ellen Burstyn losing to Julia Roberts

This was so messed up it caused one of my friends to end his support and watching of the awards show in disgust. Something he still does to this day. So this was one of those things where it seems to fly in the face of conventional wisdom. Ellen Burstyn is older and well-liked by critics and her contemporaries. She goes through quite the physical transformation looking almost nothing like herself and it’s a serious subject. For all that people complain that people like Art Carney and Sean Connery only won their Oscars as career awards, you’d swear this would be a shoo-in. However, this was the year Julia Roberts won for “Erin Brockovich.” Now it’s a fine film though apparently skims over the real life ending in a way that’s a bit low. Personally I was a bit annoyed by the character herself. If I were Albert Finney I probably would have fired her and not looked back. And before you think I’m someone who hated anything to do with Julia Roberts, I’ll make a confession here. She was my first celebrity crush. There’s no denying that she did throw herself into the role and that’s impressive.

That all having been said, did you see “Requiem For A Dream?” Not only is it one of the most hard-hitting films you’ll ever see about drugs or not, but a fascinating insight to the minds of users. Personally I never liked any of the characters. The way the film is made it still hits me as strong so the lack of likable characters doesn’t end up hurting it that much. That is except for one character, the mother. Not only is she a saint for putting up with her loser of a son selling her TV over and over, but she’s the only true victim of the film. The other characters knew what the drugs would do, but still partook. They are reaping what they sowed. The mother’s only “crime” was wanting to lose some weight to look good on TV. She knows her best years are far behind her and she has lots of hurt in her life and she’s not especially glamorous. So, she starts taking diet pills and sadly becomes addicted to them. The deterioration of her throughout the film is nothing short of heartbreaking and totally believable. She’s so believable in fact you’ll want to call your mom just to check on her. The idea she didn’t win is maddening enough, but to lose to merely a pretty good performance feels as bad as the mother must feel by the end of “Requiem.”

 

Click to see the last 3 entries!

3.) Fargo losing to The English Patient

This isn’t an example of years of hype changing people into hipsters toward it. This film had a reputation for being slow back when it came out. “Seinfeld” did an episode at the time about finding it boring and just wanting the main character to just get on with it and die which was hilarious. Now like others on this list, “The English Patient” is a very well-made film. It’s certainly well-acted. However, I distinctly remember checking my watch multiple times and thinking as an editor how much this could be cut down when I first saw this in my film appreciation class. After only a few years, the only things I can honestly remember are the image of a burnt Ralph Fiennes in a bed and Willem Dafoe getting his hand cut off. Don’t ask why that was happening, I honestly couldn’t even tell you if he was a good guy or bad guy.

Compare this with another film nominated that year, “Fargo.” Now I’ve also only seen the film all the way through once or twice. I’ve seen plenty of clips in documentaries or on YouTube in the years since, but still the point being is I can fully remember that film and not just for all the spoofs. It’s a film that doesn’t leave you easily after seeing it. I think it’s fair to say this is still the Coen Bros best film. Sure I may personally like their remake of “True Grit” more, but there’s no denying “Fargo” is their masterpiece, their iconic work. It’s one of those films many can quote tons of lines from even though they haven’t seen it. This is a classic example of the power of producer Harvey Weinstein with the Oscars. Now while I love and defend some of his other movies that may fall into this category like “The King’s Speech,” this guy comes at filmmaking more on how to sell a film to the awards season. Actual merits of the film be damned.

2.) Haliee Steinfeld for Best Supporting

This is unique in these entries due to it’s not so much who she lost to as how bad this whole situation was. Haliee Steinfeld was in the recent remake of “True Grit.” Specifically she was Mattie, THE MAIN CHARACTER. It is her character that sets the whole story into motion and it is her perspective that we follow and never deviate from in both the book, the original John Wayne version, and this remake. And like the rest of film she is fabulous in the role. The Coen Bros did a great job finding a wonderfully talented young actress for a deceitfully difficult role to play. So when the nominations came out that year we were all glad to see her recognized… until we saw she was being nominated for Best Supporting Actress. WHAT?! Again, I cannot overstate this…SHE PLAYS THE MAIN CHARACTER! It would be like if they had nominated Al Pacino for Best Supporting Actor for “The Godfather.” What really brought it home was that Jeff Bridges got a nomination for the film as Best Actor. Yeah I could consider him a co-lead with Mattie, but honestly as much of a scene stealer Rooster Cogburn is in the books and films I personally consider him more of a supporting character.

So why was this? Well a thing to remember is that the Academy actually doesn’t pick the nominees or at least what they’re nominated for. Basically how it works is that the studios decide that then send a For Your Consideration to the Academy with their films and what they think they should be nominated for. Then, the Academy itself decides which of those to nominate. Then, the members (all the actors, directors etc.) vote and that’s how it works in a very basic way. With that in mind, it is my belief that Paramount Pictures did this as a form a strategy. The buzz around that time was that it was Natalie Portman’s year for her performance in “Black Swan.” Of course those aren’t always true, but rule of thumb is that’s a good indicator. Sensing that Natalie seemed to have it in the bag and the fact Academy does not normally recognize child actors except in rare circumstances, I’m betting they thought if they put her up for Best Supporting Actress (which had no odds-on favorite that year) she would have had a better chance of actually winning the Oscar. Now personally as impressive as Portman was in “Black Swan,” I thought Jennifer Lawrence in “Winter’s Bone” was far more deserving. It was just a really solid year for young female performances in 2010. Still, I’d personally rather see someone lose on their own merits in their proper category than this failed strategic move. Although the same thing actually happened this past year with Viola Davis in “Fences.” She asked to be nominated as Best Supporting even though she’s by ANYONE’S definition the co-lead of that film. Well it worked for her so I guess the theory can’t be faulted at least.

1.) Raging Bull losing to Ordinary People

This is probably one of the biggest classic examples of Oscars upsets and one of the few I completely agree with. A thing to remember is that hindsight is 20/20. But even still this is crazy. Again, “Ordinary People” is a very good movie deserving of its praise. Judd Hirsch probably gives his best performance and really all of the actors give it their all. It’s also directed by acting legend Robert Redford as his debut film in directing. It’s certainly an impressive first film to direct although again if we’re talking Robert Redford movies, there are some I like much more like “The Milagro Beanfield War.” It’s one of those films it’s hard to really talk about other than yeah it’s pretty good. What you heard is true.

It’s just that it gets beaten to a bloody pulp by Martin Scorsese’s greatest film “Raging Bull.” Remember “Raging Bull” is the reason we still have Scorsese with us. He really got into the drugs back in the day and was practically on death’s door both health-wise and just giving up. It was Robert De Niro who brought him the script that gave him the motivation to hold on, to clean himself up, and bring this story to the screen. And he threw EVERYTHING he had of himself into the film. What can be said about the film that hasn’t already been said hundreds of time before? It is a nearly perfect film. Pick some aspect and this film does it amazingly well. The acting, the visuals, the editing, and taking a well-worn genre like boxing films and making it feel wholly original. It’s a film that often appears on the greatest films (sports or otherwise) list all the time. Sometimes “Ordinary People” will be on there too, but normally towards the bottom while “Raging Bull” is often towards the top. The only thing I can figure is that at the time of release it was too dark for the voters to handle. However, time has been kind to it and aged the film like the best kind of wine. In my heart “Raging Bull” has all the Oscars it was nominated for.

 

What do you think? Which films do you think the Oscars got horribly wrong?

Eric: Eric grew up with a simple childhood. At age 11 a six fingered man murdered his father in front of his eyes, while his mother died defending him from an attack from a sharptooth, then an evil toon dropped a piano from 15 stories onto his brother's head and then on top of all of that while on the job he was brutally shot up and left for dead but was rebuilt as a robotic cop to get his revenge. ...Oooorr maybe he just watched a lot of movies growing up and got really into them. From a young age Eric realized learning things like science, math, people's names etc. took some real effort but could easily remember practically all the dialog/plot details from a random movie he watched on tv years ago. He knew from a young age that he wanted to make movies and never strayed from that. Going to college to get an education in film production and working on movie sets whenever it can be fit into his schedule. Get him into a room full of people he doesn't know and over time you may eventually get him to open up but just mention some movies and he'll talk for hours, never afraid to (respectfully) argue with fellow movie nerds. Now he puts that love and energy toward writing for FilmFad.com.
Related Post